What frequency is good for APM data transmission: Hot topics and data analysis on the entire network
Recently, the selection of APM (autopilot module) data transmission frequency has become a hot topic of discussion among drone and model aircraft enthusiasts. This article combines the hot topics and data analysis of the entire network in the past 10 days to explore the advantages and disadvantages of different frequencies and provide structured suggestions.
1. Overview of APM data transmission frequency
APM data transmission modules usually work in the 433MHz, 915MHz or 2.4GHz frequency bands. Different frequencies have differences in transmission distance, anti-interference ability and regulatory restrictions. The following is a comparison of mainstream frequencies:
| Frequency | Transmission distance | Anti-interference ability | Applicable areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| 433MHz | Far away (5-10km) | weaker | Restricted in Europe, commonly used in Asia |
| 915MHz | COSCO (3-8km) | Stronger | North America, Australia |
| 2.4GHz | Near(1-3km) | Strong | Universally applicable (note channel conflicts) |
2. Hotly discussed opinions across the Internet
Based on social media and forum discussions in the past 10 days, the following are the focus of users:
| platform | hot topics | Support rate (high-frequency views) |
|---|---|---|
| Zhihu | “Will 433MHz be phased out?” | 60% think there is still room for use |
| Station B | "915MHz measured distance comparison" | 70% recommend it for suburban use |
| Drone Forum | "2.4GHz and WiFi conflict problem" | 45% recommended manual frequency adjustment |
3. How to choose a suitable frequency?
Combining data and user feedback, it is recommended to make decisions from the following dimensions:
1.Regulations take precedence: Check the radio regulatory regulations in your region, such as the EU ban on 433MHz partial power.
2.environment matching: 2.4GHz is preferred in urban dense areas, and 915MHz can be considered in suburbs or wild areas.
3.Device compatibility: Some flight controllers are better optimized for specific frequency bands (for example, PX4 supports 915MHz more stably).
4. Actual measurement data reference
The following are the actual measurement results of three frequencies provided by netizens in the same environment:
| Frequency | Test distance (no obstruction) | Delay (ms) | Packet loss rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 433MHz | 8.2km | 120 | 3% |
| 915MHz | 6.5km | 90 | 1.5% |
| 2.4GHz | 2.8km | 60 | 0.8% |
5. Conclusions and suggestions
Taken together,915MHzIt achieves a good balance between transmission distance and stability, especially suitable for medium and long-range applications;2.4GHzMore suitable for urban or short-distance high real-time scenarios;433MHzAlthough gradually marginalized, it is still cost-effective in certain areas. Users should weigh their choices based on actual needs.
Note: The above data is compiled from public discussions on the entire network in October 2023. The specific performance may vary depending on the device model and environment.
check the details
check the details
en
